genomeboy.com

Fantastic article in the Boston Globe about former George Church-student Katherine Aull, who has set up a lab in her apartment and is testing herself for hemochromatosis mutations.

(Hat tip: GenomeWeb)

Bob, who’s owned wild animals all his life, admits Higgins has not always been a model pet. When Higgins was 3, he slept with the couple, often awakening Bob in the morning by climbing to the bedroom rafters and dropping onto Bob’s stomach. On one occasion, they got in a wrestling match, and Higgins put one of his “steel-like fingernails” through Bob’s scrotum.

Bob has considered moving him to a sanctuary, but “I’m just too attached to him,” he says.

…

Bob has been bitten several times by Higgins, who now weighs 50 pounds and has large incisors. Once, when Bob was leading him from an outdoor enclosure back to his cage in the house, Higgins exploded and the two got into a battle so ferocious that despite the steel mesh glove Bob was wearing, he screamed for Carlie to get his .22 rifle and put a bullet in Higgins’s head. She got Higgins a slice of raisin bread instead, quickly defusing the fight. But Bob accepts it: a wild animal will never be domesticated, he says.

…

“He shivered and I leaned over and said, ‘Come here, baby, are you cold?’ and he exploded,” Ms. Bowers says. “He started biting and screaming at me, biting any place he could touch. It was a nightmare. We tipped over furniture, I would have killed him if I could. But he was so strong. I tried to choke him to make him stop. We fought for I don’t know how long. I was trying to hold him so he couldn’t bite me. I took one of my big fabric books and held it on his throat.”

…

JUDIE HARRISON, 50 and three times married, is an extreme example of monkey love. She once demanded that her 15-year-old son give up his bedroom for a chimp, and today she is estranged from all three of her children because she put the primates first. Her passion also cost her her home.

Words fail. 

Q: Don’t you think most of us want to be loved for who we are, as opposed to some artificially enhanced version of ourselves?
A: That will never happen. Are you out of your mind?

Joan Rivers on the enhancement imperative.

Sway: I know people have piercings, tattoos. Eric, in particular, is talking about a ban on sagging pants. Do [you] feel like people should be penalized?

Obama: Here is my attitude: I think people passing a law against people wearing sagging pants is a waste of time. We should be focused on creating jobs, improving our schools, health care, dealing with the war in Iraq, and anybody, any public official, that is worrying about sagging pants probably needs to spend some time focusing on real problems out there. Having said that, brothers should pull up their pants. You are walking by your mother, your grandmother, your underwear is showing. What’s wrong with that? Come on. There are some issues that we face, that you don’t have to pass a law, but that doesn’t mean folks can’t have some sense and some respect for other people and, you know, some people might not want to see your underwear — I’m one of them.

Via the immortal Balk

Rich people salivating.

As the party throbbed in the ground floor space of Barry Diller’s IAC Building on West 18th Street, Mr. Weinstein, the film producer, who has acquired the Halston clothing brand, joked that DNA testing was as buzzworthy as the fashion shows taking place all week. “Now that I’m in the fashion business,” he said, “I think genetics is a natural extension.”

Obviously there’s not much to see here (other than the above photo of Django in repose). I am traveling around New England, trying to write and trying to prepare for the fall semester. Back soon, I hope…God knows I miss the spam…

I can only hope that this is still active, because I’m sure every homeless hospital patient in New York would be glad to know that his/her genome is worth five gallons of gas, four Sunday Times, three six packs, and a partridge in a freaking pear tree.

The hospital plans to offer a $20 incentive to any patient who donates an eight-milliliter vial of blood to a new Biobank, a warehouse of DNA and plasma that is a central component of the hospital’s Institute for Personalized Medicine. “Personalized medicine,” an approach that incorporates molecular analysis into managing a patient’s health, has been touted as the future of medicine ever since scientists completed the map of the human genome in 2003.

Woo hoo! Muchos gracias, Mt. Sinai! Can I give 16 mls and get $40? Can I bring my kids in, too? How much for my dog’s lymphocytes?

“Vegas Solves Health Care Crisis!”

(l to r) Brian Greene, some photobomber, Paul Nurse, Nikolas Rose, Jim Evans, Francis Collins

The World Science Festival was as delightful as advertised. The street fair was overflowing with stuff to do, especially for kids. Next year I hope to bring mine. Bravo to Brian Greene!

I don’t know how my fellow panelists or the audience felt, but I thought our session, “Your Biological Biography,” was both fun and engaging, largely due to the masterful moderating job of Sir Paul Nurse, who is the antithesis of the stereotypical egocentric Nobel laureate/major university president. He is quick-witted, modest to a fault, and a brilliant conversationalist, someone you could chat with for hours on just about any subject. Drs. Rose, Evans and Collins responded in kind with thoughtful and nuanced discussion of personal genomics and all of the surrounding medical, legal, ethical and social issues. My only regret is that Dr. Latanya Sweeney was not able to make it and share her insights on genomic privacy.

I talked about getting my SNP data from George and from Navigenics, the limitations of it, SNPedia, my family history, my own curiosity, and how I’m probably not a terribly zealous early adopter after all. At the end I tried to make two points. One is that genome scientists themselves are succeeding in killing genetic determinism where bioethicists and philosophers have failed. That is, by finding that traits like type 2 diabetes and height are influenced by some ridiculous number of genes and the environment, genomicists are putting to rest the notion that single genes typically exert powerful, inexorable effects that determine who we are. Yeah, that happens in some cases, but complex traits are still complex, which makes accurate genetic predictions harder to achieve and genetic discrimination even harder to justify.

The other thing I tried to get across is that simply trashing personal genomics companies is not terribly helpful. Whatever their shortcomings (and they have plenty), these companies are here to stay in some way, shape or form. The more productive things to do, in my opinion, are to find out why people want this information, what their expectations are for it, how it should and shouldn’t be regulated, and how personal genomics, in all of its guises, can be assimilated by both the health care community and the public in useful ways.

You know, people, if you give a guy a few Navitinis, he’s probably not gonna remember much at all…

Just sayin’.