Comments for genomeboy.com http://genomeboy.com Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:42:06 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1 Comment on You’re gonna make me lonesome by Thank you! « A Blog Around The Clock http://genomeboy.com/2010/07/19/youre-gonna-make-me-lonesome/#comment-14529 Thank you! « A Blog Around The Clock Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:44:04 +0000 http://genomeboy.com/2010/07/19/youre-gonna-make-me-lonesome/#comment-14529 [...] her here), John Hawks, mrswhatsit, Dana Hunter, John Dupuis, Josh Rosenau, Sharon Astyk (and more), Misha Angrist, Pamela Ronald, Ian Brooks, Jason Goldman, John McKay, Kristjan Wager, John Wilkins, John Lynch [...] […] her here), John Hawks, mrswhatsit, Dana Hunter, John Dupuis, Josh Rosenau, Sharon Astyk (and more), Misha Angrist, Pamela Ronald, Ian Brooks, Jason Goldman, John McKay, Kristjan Wager, John Wilkins, John Lynch […]

]]> Comment on Presumably Dogs Don’t Get Pestered on “Relative Finder” by Neuron Culture - Gleanings: genetic goofs & mutts, and where good ideas come from http://genomeboy.com/2010/06/09/presumably-dogs-dont-get-pestered-on-relative-finder/#comment-14525 Neuron Culture - Gleanings: genetic goofs & mutts, and where good ideas come from Wed, 07 Jul 2010 15:46:54 +0000 http://genomeboy.com/2010/06/09/presumably-dogs-dont-get-pestered-on-relative-finder/#comment-14525 [...] ponders a dog’s life, as glimpsed through its [...] […] ponders a dog’s life, as glimpsed through its […]

]]> Comment on HIPAA, Shmipaa by HIPAA Compliance http://genomeboy.com/2009/01/25/hipaa-shmipaa/#comment-14517 HIPAA Compliance Wed, 16 Jun 2010 20:31:07 +0000 http://genomeboy.com/2009/01/25/hipaa-shmipaa/#comment-14517 <strong>HIPAA Compliance...</strong> Interesting genomeboy.com | HIPAA, Shmipaa post.... HIPAA Compliance…

Interesting genomeboy.com | HIPAA, Shmipaa post….

]]> Comment on After the gold rush by Gene Patents Invalidated – What’s Next? | MessagingLab http://genomeboy.com/2010/03/30/after-the-gold-rush/#comment-14489 Gene Patents Invalidated – What’s Next? | MessagingLab Tue, 06 Apr 2010 17:24:38 +0000 http://genomeboy.com/2010/03/30/after-the-gold-rush/#comment-14489 [...] case) “Who Owns Your Genes? You Do,” Discover Magazine, Genome Web, Genome Boy’s After the Gold Rush (which is not as negative as it sounds), and Wired (which includes nice debate in the comments [...] […] case) “Who Owns Your Genes? You Do,” Discover Magazine, Genome Web, Genome Boy’s After the Gold Rush (which is not as negative as it sounds), and Wired (which includes nice debate in the comments […]

]]> Comment on After the gold rush by More Myriad: Moving Beyond Single Gene Patents http://genomeboy.com/2010/03/30/after-the-gold-rush/#comment-14486 More Myriad: Moving Beyond Single Gene Patents Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:57:44 +0000 http://genomeboy.com/2010/03/30/after-the-gold-rush/#comment-14486 [...] Misha Angrist identifies this issue as well, and points to research he performed with Duke colleagues – which also appears in the SACGHS report on gene patents – that suggests patent “monopolies are not necessary incentives for innovation in DNA diagnostics.” Angrist also points out that patents do not persist forever – by the time AMP v. USPTO reaches a final decision, several of Myriad’s core patents may have only a few years of life left – but there are good reasons to believe that the coming collision between single gene patents and multiplex genetic testing will demand material change in advance of organic patent expirations. As has been said many times previously, the AMP v. USPTO decision is an important step in that direction, but it is only a step. [...] […] Misha Angrist identifies this issue as well, and points to research he performed with Duke colleagues – which also appears in the SACGHS report on gene patents – that suggests patent “monopolies are not necessary incentives for innovation in DNA diagnostics.” Angrist also points out that patents do not persist forever – by the time AMP v. USPTO reaches a final decision, several of Myriad’s core patents may have only a few years of life left – but there are good reasons to believe that the coming collision between single gene patents and multiplex genetic testing will demand material change in advance of organic patent expirations. As has been said many times previously, the AMP v. USPTO decision is an important step in that direction, but it is only a step. […]

]]> Comment on They said, they said by Twitter Trackbacks for genomeboy.com | They said, they said [genomeboy.com] on Topsy.com http://genomeboy.com/2010/01/05/they-said-they-said/#comment-14452 Twitter Trackbacks for genomeboy.com | They said, they said [genomeboy.com] on Topsy.com Wed, 06 Jan 2010 20:38:43 +0000 http://genomeboy.com/2010/01/05/they-said-they-said/#comment-14452 [...] genomeboy.com | They said, they said genomeboy.com/2010/01/05/they-said-they-said – view page – cached For those few of you who are not regular readers of the European Journal of Clinical Investigation, I call your attention to the current issue. It features a debate between those who believe genetic risk information ought to be available to anyone [DEL: with $985 :DEL] who wants it, and [DEL: paternalistic men in white coats defending the status quo :DEL] those who believe it ought to be vetted... Read moreFor those few of you who are not regular readers of the European Journal of Clinical Investigation, I call your attention to the current issue. It features a debate between those who believe genetic risk information ought to be available to anyone [DEL: with $985 :DEL] who wants it, and [DEL: paternalistic men in white coats defending the status quo :DEL] those who believe it ought to be vetted by randomized clinical trials. View page [...] […] genomeboy.com | They said, they said genomeboy.com/2010/01/05/they-said-they-said – view page – cached For those few of you who are not regular readers of the European Journal of Clinical Investigation, I call your attention to the current issue. It features a debate between those who believe genetic risk information ought to be available to anyone [DEL: with $985 :DEL] who wants it, and [DEL: paternalistic men in white coats defending the status quo :DEL] those who believe it ought to be vetted… Read moreFor those few of you who are not regular readers of the European Journal of Clinical Investigation, I call your attention to the current issue. It features a debate between those who believe genetic risk information ought to be available to anyone [DEL: with $985 :DEL] who wants it, and [DEL: paternalistic men in white coats defending the status quo :DEL] those who believe it ought to be vetted by randomized clinical trials. View page […]

]]> Comment on Money for nothin’ and your SNPs for free? by Is deCODEme Taking a Page from the 23andMe Playbook? http://genomeboy.com/2009/06/19/money-for-nothin-and-your-snps-for-free/#comment-14451 Is deCODEme Taking a Page from the 23andMe Playbook? Thu, 17 Dec 2009 22:46:26 +0000 http://genomeboy.com/2009/06/19/money-for-nothin-and-your-snps-for-free/#comment-14451 [...] announced something similar over the summer, and promptly ran into fundraising difficulties. But not only is deCODEme an [...] […] announced something similar over the summer, and promptly ran into fundraising difficulties. But not only is deCODEme an […]

]]> Comment on About Me by ScienceOnline2010 – introducing the participants « Science in the Triangle http://genomeboy.com/about/#comment-14447 ScienceOnline2010 – introducing the participants « Science in the Triangle Tue, 01 Dec 2009 02:59:44 +0000 http://genomeboy.com/about/#comment-14447 [...] Professor in the Duke University Institute for Genome Sciences & Policy. He uses his blog Genomeboy to write about the experience of being one of the subjects of the Personal Genome [...] […] Professor in the Duke University Institute for Genome Sciences & Policy. He uses his blog Genomeboy to write about the experience of being one of the subjects of the Personal Genome […]

]]> Comment on Personal Genomics Agonistes by A short but glorious rant [Genetic Future] http://genomeboy.com/2009/11/24/personal-genomics-agonistes/#comment-14442 A short but glorious rant [Genetic Future] Wed, 25 Nov 2009 07:00:18 +0000 http://genomeboy.com/2009/11/24/personal-genomics-agonistes/#comment-14442 [...] 25th, 2009 · No Comments Misha Angrist has a very brief but eloquent rant in response to the genomics nay-sayers in this Nature News piece on the bankruptcy of deCODE [...] […] 25th, 2009 · No Comments Misha Angrist has a very brief but eloquent rant in response to the genomics nay-sayers in this Nature News piece on the bankruptcy of deCODE […]

]]> Comment on Personal Genomics Agonistes by Twitter Trackbacks for genomeboy.com | Personal Genomics Agonistes [genomeboy.com] on Topsy.com http://genomeboy.com/2009/11/24/personal-genomics-agonistes/#comment-14440 Twitter Trackbacks for genomeboy.com | Personal Genomics Agonistes [genomeboy.com] on Topsy.com Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:25:51 +0000 http://genomeboy.com/2009/11/24/personal-genomics-agonistes/#comment-14440 [...] genomeboy.com | Personal Genomics Agonistes genomeboy.com/2009/11/24/personal-genomics-agonistes – view page – cached At Nature News, there is something of a eulogy/finger-pointing festival for deCODE and indeed, for personal genomics in general: [...] […] genomeboy.com | Personal Genomics Agonistes genomeboy.com/2009/11/24/personal-genomics-agonistes – view page – cached At Nature News, there is something of a eulogy/finger-pointing festival for deCODE and indeed, for personal genomics in general: […]

]]>